If there was enough pressure on the face of the rads then I would say you would not need the venturi effect as you so aptly described. I like the look of the Mazda vents but I'm not sure they would do any good and actually may hamper flow if I added them on without a considerable leading edge lip. As we have all seen on many racecars there is often a lip on the leading edge of exit vents such as this to create a low pressure zone in the duct itself. The Mazda probably had enough front side pressure to avoid this need and I am counting on the vacuum effect out the rear of the car to pull the air through. As there is considerable vacuum off the back. If there are any aero experts listening in please feel free to join in.
cheers
Here is a web page that I think, will give you good input. It concerns mainly aircraft cooling, but it is applicable to us, because the page is talking about going 200 mph with the least drag and the most efficient cooling.
The page is here:
Radiators
The page also has equations, and math and people arguing.

Don't even worry about the page's bias toward Wankel rotary engines. A radiator is a radiator is a radiator. The best cooling of hot engines in small spaces with the least drag while going fast is what we and they are all about.
In fact, I think the book they offer on cooling (
Cooling the Wankel) could help us all quite a lot. No, I am not selling the book, and I receive nothing for mentioning it. I am trying to help
us, that is all.
Of course, with real math, that will slow us down building our cars, but the end product (cooler, more reliable, more efficient, smaller and faster SL-C's) is what really counts.
Bassanio et Portia
